HomeMy WebLinkAboutPACKET Estes Valley Planning Commission 2018-09-18
The Estes Valley Planning Commission reserves the right to consider other appropriate items not available at the time the
agenda was prepared.
Prepared: September 12, 2018
AGENDA
ESTES VALLEY PLANNING COMMISSION
September 18, 2018
1:30 p.m. Board Room, Town Hall
1. OPEN MEETING
Planning Commissioner Introductions
2. AGENDA APPROVAL
3. PUBLIC COMMENT
The EVPC will accept public comments regarding items not on the agenda. Comments should
not exceed three minutes.
4. CONSENT AGENDA
Minutes: August 21, 2018
5. SPECIAL REVIEW-ESTES PARK TROLLEYS
1340 Big Thompson Avenue Senior Planner Woeber
6. REPORTS
A. Staff-Level Reviews
B. Pre Application Reviews
C. Current Applications
D. Neighbor Notification Amendment
E. Density Bonus
F. Code changes
7. ADJOURN
Town of Estes Park, Larimer County, Colorado August 21, 2018
Minutes of a Study Session meeting of the PLANNING COMMISSION of the Town of
Estes Park, Larimer County, Colorado. Meeting held Room 202/203 of Town Hall.
Commission: Chair Leavitt, Vice Chair White, Commissioners Schneider, Foster,
Murphree, Hull, Theis
Attending: Leavitt, Schneider, Foster, White, Theis, Murphree
Also Attending: Town Attorney White, Director Hunt, Senior Planner Woeber, Planner I
Becker, Senior Planner Woeber, County Liaison Whitley, Town Board
Liaison Norris, and Recording Secretary Swanlund
Absent: Commissioner Hull
Chair Leavitt called the meeting to order at 11:00 a.m.
There were approximately 13 people in attendance. This study session was streamed and recorded
on the Town of Estes Park YouTube channel.
Introduction of PC Members and staff
Town Administrator Frank Lancaster spoke on a November ballot initiative that was approved, ballot
issue number 74, “Just compensation for fair market value by government law and regulation”, funded
by oil and gas industry and submitted through the farm bureau. It will allow property owners to seek
compensation from municipalities if their land is devalued. This could have major ramifications for
land use planning. Director Hunt referenced the Bert-Harris act in Florida as being something similar.
Wind River Development Plan, Special Review (child care) and lot consolidation
Planner Woeber summarized the Development Plan and Day Care special review. The amended plat
is a staff level review and not in the scope of the Planning Commissioners review. Concerns were
raised about landscaping with two lots vs one lot. Attorney White noted that lot consolidation is a use
by right. It is an appealable issue, although staff level. Planning Commission concerns from June
have been addressed by the applicant regarding the Development Plan. There are conditions to do
curb and gutter by CDOT if plan is approved. Discussion was had to clarify section 1.6, Housing Cost
Limits. The Day Care facility was reviewed and it was noted that the Development Plan and Special
Review are not legally linked but have been treated as singular package by reviewing agencies and
the public.
Location and Extent-Upper Thompson Sanitation District
Planner Woeber described the UTSD facilities and the plan for replacing the office and one garage
stall in the exact same footprint.
Estes Park Trolleys, Code Amendment and Special Review
Planner Woeber stated that the second page of exhibit Red has been replaced with a new handout.
The Bus/Sightseeing use is not addressed in Code, therefore this is the reason for this text
amendment. The applicant has used up their two temporary use permits and needs this code
Planning Commission Study Session July 17, 2018 – Page 2
amendment to continue to operate in their current location. The definition of “facility” will be
discussed in the public meeting as well as on site employee parking. It was asked if this code change
is meeting the need of a particular vendor or if there is a shortage of commercial properties. Director
Hunt explained the zoning conditions and noted that there are at least two other various permutations
going on right now that could benefit from this. Considerable discussion was had on what would and
would not be allowed on site.
Black Canyon Wedding Development Plan
Planner Becker stated that this will be pushed to the October 16 Planning Commission meeting, as
the applicants have not submitted updated plans.
Neighborhood/Community Meetings Code Amendment
Planner Becker reviewed the proposed Code Amendment change requiring developers to hold
neighborhood/community meetings once a Development Plan has been submitted. Details have
been taken from the city of Alachua, Florida. The meeting would use the same mailing list as the
application, and this would not expand the time frame of the application. This would encompass
everything that requires a public hearing. Any project of which there may be large community interest
could be added, even if it is a staff level review with an appropriate code amendment. Rezoning is
not covered in the table but is included in “Code Amendments”.
Lunch break 12:00-12:20
EVCPAC18 (comp plan) Report
Commissioner Foster discussed the first bi-monthly meeting of the EVCPAC, the committee formed
to jump start the update of the Comprehensive Plan. Trustee Norris is the chairman of the
committee. The goal of the next 3-4 meetings will be to come up with a deliverable RFP to a
consultant by December 31, 2018. A community outreach plan to cover the public interest was
mentioned. Trustee Norris added that meetings are every 2 weeks on Thursday at 3:30. Meetings
are open to the public. Next meeting will develop what to include and not include in a table of
contents, and initial thoughts on public outreach. The consultant picked for this phase is not
necessarily the same consultant that will write the plan.
Housing Needs study report:
Trustee Norris reviewed the town board discussion, which included putting together a Town Board
Committee for workforce housing and child care needs and issues, with Trustee Bangs and Assistant
Administrator Machalek. It is clear that there is a need for housing but the actual number is not clear.
The study doesn’t break down housing needs by category. Focusing on the solutions to the study’s
11 recommendations is the goal.
Code Modifications
Director Hunt suggested that it is time to amend Development Plan Review Requirements, Section
3.8, Table 3.3 of the Development Code. The table needs another column to be a complete table.
The added column would say what happens if review doesn’t fall into either of the other columns (e.g.
less than 10 parking spaces). Most codes for minimal parking spaces start at 3, not 10. Larimer
County bases its reviews on use or square footage of the building. Hunt proposed fixing the “loop
hole” with an amendment available for review by October.
Planning Commission Study Session July 17, 2018 – Page 3
Zoning Map discrepancy
Hunt summarized the original 1999 Zoning Map, dated as late as 2013, has a problem and was not
accurate for approximately 10 years. Cross hatch symbols for open spaces were placed on the map,
sometime around 2007, which should have never been added to the zoning map. Rules are very
strict about adding to official zoning maps. A proposal to readopt the entire official zoning map, after
thorough review by an independent auditor, to remove all question and doubt was advised. The legal
document is The Map, circa 1999. We owe the community an apology for the inaccurate map being
available to the public for the past 10 years.
Dark Skies Initiative
Commissioner White discussed how the Dark Sky Initiative came about, noting that “astro-tourism” is
a new, trending market. Rocky Mountain National Park has already taken the steps toward an
application process, which takes 1 to 2 years. If we go ahead with this, we would be the first National
Park/Gateway community pair to do this. Director Hunt noted that EP Light and Power would be most
affected by such a change, with a possible phase-in plan. More information and details will be
discussed in the September meeting. Currently, our code requires this with new construction and
vacation rentals.
Mountain Coaster
Hunt summarized the Mountain Coaster project, stating that it has been approved by staff and there
is a high probability of an appeal. If the appeal is in regard to the development plan it could come to
the Planning Commission. On August 6, when approval letter was issued, the clock started on the 30
day appeal process, which would make the deadline Wednesday, September 5. It is possible to have
two appeals, one for use classification and one for development plan. The appeal then has 60 days
to be brought before the decision making body.
Future Study Session Items
Vacation Home Regulations-October
Dark Skies Initiative
Zoning Map
Secretary Swanlund suggested texting the Commissioners, rather than calling, to let them know when
their note books are available for pick up.
There being no further business, Chair Leavitt adjourned the meeting at 1:17 p.m.
_____________________________________
Bob Leavitt, Chair
Karin Swanlund, Recording Secretary
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
Estes Valley Planning Commission
August 21, 2018
Board Room, Estes Park Town Hall
1
Commission: Chair Bob Leavitt, Vice-Chair Sharry White, Commissioners Betty Hull,
Russ Schneider, Robert Foster, Frank Theis, Steve Murphree
Attending: Chair Leavitt, Commissioners Schneider, White, Foster, Murphree and
Theis
Also Attending: Director Randy Hunt, Town Attorney Greg White, Senior Planner Jeff
Woeber, Planner Robin Becker, Town Board Liaison Ron Norris, County
Staff Liaison Michael Whitley, Recording Secretary Karin Swanlund
Absent: Commissioner Hull
Chair Leavitt called the meeting to order at 1:30 p.m. There were approximately 70 people in
attendance.
1. OPEN MEETING
Planning Commission/Staff Introductions
2. APPROVAL OF AGENDA
It was moved and seconded (White/Schneider) to approve the agenda as presented
and the motion passed 6-0.
3. CONSENT AGENDA
Approval of July 17, 2018 Planning Commission meeting minutes.
It was moved and seconded (Schneider/Foster) to approve the consent agenda as
presented and the motion passed 6-0.
4. BLACK CANYON WEDDING DEVELOPMENT PLAN
Planner Becker reported that this item was continued to the next Planning Commission
meeting to be held October 16, 2018 and that a public meeting with neighborhood and
community members was to be held August 23 at the Black Canyon Office.
Public Comment:
Anna Claassen, town citizen, questioned when the public meeting was planned and noted
that neighbors have not been notified
Jay Blackwood, town citizen, stated that a glitch in GPS brings people to the Black
Canyon neighborhood rather than the Black Canyon Inn, and this project would cause
more issues with people coming to the wrong address. He would like GPS to be fixed.
It was moved and seconded (Foster/Theis) to continue the Development Plan to the
October 16, 2018 meeting and the motion passed 6-0.
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
Estes Valley Planning Commission
August 21, 2018
Board Room, Estes Park Town Hall
2
5. RECOMMENDATION FOR APPROVAL OF THE DEVELOPMENT PLAN LOCATED AT
1041 SOUTH SAINT VRAIN AVE, KNOW AS WIND RIVER APARTMENTS.
Planner Woeber stated that this application was reviewed by the EVPC at their June 19,
2018 meeting. Due to questions that were raised by the EVPC, and with concurrence of
the applicant, the application was continued to the July 17, 2018 EVPC meeting. With
revisions not being available in time for that meeting, it was continued to the August 21,
2018 EVPC meeting. The applicant, in their revised submittal materials, has detailed all
requested revisions, and has outlined specifically what has been revised.
The subject property is 5.77 acres in size and is undeveloped. Currently the site is two
separate lots. A lot consolidation application has been submitted to combine Lots 1 and 2
of Wapiti Minor Subdivision into one lot. The development consists of four multi-family
structures, three 24-unit buildings and one 22-unit building resulting in 78 units with two
bedrooms and 16 units with one bedroom. Legal notices were published in the Estes
Park Trail Gazette and adjacent property owners were notified. There is significant
opposition to this project. Staff recommended approval of the Wind River Apartments
Development Plan and approval of the associated waiver request to reduce the radius of
a section of an internal drive.
Staff and Commission Questions:
Director Hunt recused himself from discussion due to owning property and living across
the street from the Development Project. Woeber stated that the housing cost limits has
been revised in the restricted covenant agreements.
Applicant Discussion:
Paul Pewterbaugh stated that the reason for the delay was to be sure to address all the
concerns, feedback and input from both the Planning Commission and the public. All
members of the team were present at the meeting to answer all questions that may arise.
He then summarized the components of the application.
Eric Blackhurst, President of Estes Park Housing Authority, presented an abbreviated
presentation on the housing needs situation. The first housing study was done in 1989-
1990, community wide, and three studies have been done since, 1999, 2008 and 2016, all
with similar results.
Joe Coop, Van Horn Engineering, displayed the sidewalk proposal along Lexington Lane,
and the west side of highway 7. A Pedestrian Study showed that a lighted pedestrian
crossing beacon didn’t warrant a CDOT permit. He also discussed the drainage issues
and plans that would vastly improve the current system. The traffic study determined that
there were 45 trips per hour, thus not triggering a left turn lane onto Highway 7. Mail
cluster boxes will not be on Lexington Lane.
Steve Lane, Basis Architecture, reviewed the lot density which was calculated on being
one lot at 5.77 acres without a dedicated private street. Lot size does not affect the
density of the day care or number of units. The height and density bonus was approved
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
Estes Valley Planning Commission
August 21, 2018
Board Room, Estes Park Town Hall
3
to allow RM zoned properties to solve the housing needs. The 15% open
space/recreational space is met. The height code will be met, with the 3 story buildings
being dug into the west side of the lot. Parking has 182 spaces for units and 16 guest
spaces which is more than most neighboring communities. The EVDC specifies that this
development should have 204 parking spaces. Taking out 4 units would allow us to meet
the requirement, but nothing would change with regard to the site plan and traffic. Our
proposal includes a request to allow 182 spaces rather than the 204 per the EVDC.
Public Comment: Comments are summarized, full comments can be found on the Town
of Estes website at www.estes.gov/meetingvideos for 12 months from the date of meeting
The following town citizens spoke in opposition with concerns related to: pedestrian and
traffic safety, drainage, flooding, work force housing density, parking, garbage generated,
and Vacation Home impacts:
Marcia Weaver, Kristen Hill, Liz Lord, Karen Nicholson, Adam Bensma, Brookie
Gallagher, Nancy Fuller, Martha Rouch, Katie Sykes
Town citizens speaking in favor stating the following reasons: the need for work force
housing, property rights, many business owners and workers in favor, take advantage of
developers willing to invest their money, and 352 people on the affordable housing
waitlist:
James Poppitz, Kent Smith, Jon Nicholas, Greg Rosener, Charley Dickey, Naomi Hawf
Commissioner/Applicant Discussion:
Paul Pewterbaugh emphasized that he understands the concerns of the neighbors, but
this property has been zoned RM for years. Businesses using apartments for employees
would be held to the same requirements as private renters. Covenants have an
occupancy limit of two people per bedroom, plus one. Housing Authority will oversee the
leases, as hired by the Town of Estes Park. One year leases are desired, six month
leases are the minimum. The hope is to attract families that work and help run the town.
Deed restrictions are 50 years, and run with the land. Joe Coop addressed the drainage
questions clarifying how the drainage plan will help the neighborhoods to the east.
Commissioner Comments: Comments are summarized, full comments can be found on
the Town of Estes website at www.estes.gov/meetingvideos for 12 months from the date
of meeting.
• Workforce housing is needed but so is the need to be careful with unintended
consequences
• Abuse of the intended use of the density bonus. Two lots were combined but all the
housing was placed on one lot, producing a density much greater than 16 units per
acre, which was envisioned when the code amendment was adopted.
• Maximum density does not have to be granted. The EVDC says up to a maximum
of 200% depending on site-specific conditions. This is supported by the EVDC
section 11.2.B "site-specific conditions may prevent maximum bonus density levels
from being achieved due to the character of the land or surrounding uses."
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
Estes Valley Planning Commission
August 21, 2018
Board Room, Estes Park Town Hall
4
• Inadequate facilities for parking within the development. Proposed parking is less
than the EVDC requirement.
• Traffic and parking on Lexington Lane. This road is narrow and it will be difficult to
handle the traffic load. The Town does not even want to install "No Parking" signs,
according to the developer.
• Serious concerns for pedestrian and bicycle safety on Lexington Lane and at the
Highway 7 crossing.
• There are no conditions put on the project to mitigate parking and safety issues.
• Lack of compromise on either side in the two months that have passed since the
last public hearing.
• Workforce housing needs to be addressed in sensible and reasonable way,
respecting the rights and interests of all parties involved.
It was moved and seconded (Foster/Schneider) to deny the Development Plan
application without findings and the motion passed 4-2 with Theis and Murphree
voting against.
A ten minute recess was called at 4:20
6. APPROVAL OF A SPECIAL REVIEW TO ALLOW A “DAY CARE CENTER” IN A
MULTI FAMILY-RM RESIDENTIAL ZONING DISTRICT
Summary: in addition to the Development Plan, the applicant has included a proposal for
a day care facility on the apartment site, to serve the residents but which is also intended
to have the capacity or openings for children from outside the development. The daycare
is proposed within an existing structure on the property, which would be remodeled and
expanded, with a portion also used as a leasing office. Legal notices were published in
the Estes Park Trail Gazette and adjacent property owners were notified. Staff
recommends the Planning Commission forward a recommendation of approval of the
Special Review Use for the Wind River Day Care Center to the Town Board of Trustees
with the following condition: The approved use shall be consistent with the plans and
information as submitted by the applicant for the Special Review Use.
Applicant Pewterbaugh elected to continue with the Special Review of the Day Care
Center stating that the Development Plan would attract a lot of young families, with a
projected 60% use from the apartments.
Steve Lane reviewed the plans for the day care facility and leasing office.
It was moved and seconded (Schneider/White) to approve the application for a
Special Review Use the item and the motion passed 6-0.
7. EVDC TEXT AMENDMENT
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
Estes Valley Planning Commission
August 21, 2018
Board Room, Estes Park Town Hall
5
To add “Sightseeing/Tour Vehicle Facility” as an S2 Special Review use in the A,
Accommodations, the CD, Downtown Commercial and the CO, Outlying Commercial
Zoning Districts, and also add a definition of the same. Staff recommended a review of
the amendment for compliance with the EVDC §3.3.D Code Amendments, Standards for
Review and forward a recommendation to the Estes Park Town Board of Trustees and the
Larimer County Commissioners for a final decision to approve.
Staff/Commission Questions:
It was explained that most users of Sightseeing/bus tours are staying in A zoning, thus the
reason for putting buses in Accommodation Zoning, in addition to Commercial Zoning.
The Special Review would allow rulings based on the specifics of individual applications.
Public Comment:
Bob Berman, 1442 Raven Circle, expressed concerns about putting a bus barn on one of
the major entrances to the town while the other companies have found less obtrusive
areas. This company is not new and had a different place to park at one time. Once
approval is given to one company, it will open up the door for all other Special Reviews in
A zoning, which are all over town.
Commissioner Discussion: comments are summarized
S2 review would be on a case by case basis with conditions allowed to be added. Don’t
see the need to add the A zoning or change the code. This particular property has had
problems with all businesses that have operated out of the location. The code has
prohibitions for fueling and repairs in regard to the word “facility”.
It was moved and seconded (Murphree/Leavitt) to recommend that the Estes Park
Board of Trustees and the Board of Larimer County Commissioners approve the
text amendment to the EVDC as presented by staff, with findings recommended by
staff. The motion was approved 4-2 with Foster and Schneider voting against.
8. ESTES PARK TROLLEYS S-2 SPECIAL REVIEW
The applicant requested approval of an S2 Special Review for the use,
“Sightseeing/Tour Vehicle Facility” in the A, Accommodations Zoning District.
Summary: this special review was contingent upon approval of the related Code
Amendment. Staff found that this use has been established at this location for
approximately one year, and impacts have been minimal. Staff recommends that
Planning Commission forward a recommendation of approval of the Special Review Use
for a Sightseeing/Tour Vehicle Facility in an A, Accommodations Zoning District with the
following conditions:
1. The approved use shall generally be consistent with the materials submitted by the
applicant, and shall specifically include the applicants proposed use of the facility
only as a sales office and point of dispatch for tours, and the limitation on the
number of vehicles in the fleet.
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
Estes Valley Planning Commission
August 21, 2018
Board Room, Estes Park Town Hall
6
2. Within 30 days of Special Review approval, applicant shall submit a Landscaping
Plan to the Community Development Department, providing an effective screening
with trees and shrubs from adjacent roads. The Landscaping Plan shall be
reviewed and approve by staff, and the landscaping shall be established by the
applicant within 60 days after staffs approval of the Landscaping Plan.
Landscaping shall be inspected and approved by staff.
Staff/Commission Questions:
Director Hunt proposed, since the applicant was not present, two alternatives: continue
the item to the next meeting or deny the application without prejudice.
It was moved and seconded (Foster/White) to continue the Special Review Use for a
Sightseeing/Tour Vehicle Facility to September 18, 2018. The motion passed 6-0.
9. UPPER THOMPSON SANITATION DISCTRICT LOCATION AND EXTENT REVIEW
Planner Woeber detailed the review of a location and extent for a partial rebuild of the
sanitation districts existing office/shop facility in a CO, Outlying Commercial Zoning
District. The proposal involves rebuilding an approximately 3000 square foot building,
including the office and one of the seven garage bays, all proposed within the existing
footprint. Legal notices were published in the Estes Park Trail Gazette and adjacent
property owners were notified. Staff recommends the Planning Commission approve the
Location and Extent Review Application as submitted by the applicant.
Applicant Discussion:
Jess Reetz, Cornerstone Engineering, stated that the project is much needed as the
facility is old and outdated.
It was moved and seconded (Theis/Foster) to approve the Upper Thompson Sanitation
District’s application for a Location and Extent Review, with staff findings. The motion
passed 6-0.
10. PROPOSED TEXT AMENDMENT TO THE ESTES VALLEY DEVELOPMENT CODE:
EVDC §3.2 STANDARD DEVELOPMENT REVIEW PROCEDURE B. NEIGHBORHOOD
AND COMMUNITY MEETING, §3.2 F SUMMARY TABLE STANDARD DEVELOPMENT
REVIEW PROCESS BY APPLICATION TYPE, CHAPTER 13 DEFINITIONS, AND
APPENDIX B SUBMITTAL REQUREMENTS.
Planner Becker discussed the proposed Text Amendment that would allow property
owners to become informed and involved in the Estes Valley Development Review
Process in regard to projects in their neighborhood.
Staff/Commission Discussion:
An application will be deemed incomplete if meeting is not held. If a meeting was
attempted, but did not happen, a letter would need to be submitted stating why. This
would apply to anything that requires a public meeting, including Annexation and
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
Estes Valley Planning Commission
August 21, 2018
Board Room, Estes Park Town Hall
7
Rezoning. Use classification would only be a recommendation and not required, since
use classifications may not be applicable to a specific location.
Public Comment:
Naomi Hawf, Estes Park Housing Authority, questioned how and what type of notice
would be sent. Hunt and Becker answered that a 10 day notice prior to meeting, an ad in
the newspaper and a mailing using the same address list as the Community Development
office would be required.
It was moved and seconded (White/Foster) to recommend that the Estes Park Town
Board of Trustees and the Board of Larimer County Commissioners approve the
text amendment to the Estes Valley Development Code, according to findings of
fact and as recommended by staff. The motion passed 5-0. (Commissioner
Murphree left meeting early)
11. REPORTS
Due to the length of the meeting, there were no reports given.
There being no further business, Chair Leavitt adjourned the meeting at 5:35 p.m.
_________________________________
Bob Leavitt, Chair
__________________________________
Karin Swanlund, Recording Secretary
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
Estes Valley Planning Commission
August 21, 2018
Board Room, Estes Park Town Hall
6
EVDC §3.2 STANDARD DEVELOPMENT REVIEW PROCEDURE B. NEIGHBORHOOD
AND COMMUNITY MEETING, §3.2 F SUMMARY TABLE STANDARD DEVELOPMENT
REVIEW PROCESS BY APPLICATION TYPE, CHAPTER 13 DEFINITIONS, AND
APPENDIX B SUBMITTAL REQUREMENTS.
Planner Becker discussed the Text Amendment that would allow property owners to
become informed and involved in the Estes Valley Development Review Process in
regard to projects in their neighborhood.
Staff/Commission Discussion:
An applicaton will be deemed incomplete if meeting is not held. Is there a way for
somebody who as tried to have the meeting but for what ever reason it did not
happen….Submit a letter stating why the meeting did not proceed. This would
apply to anything that requires a public meeting, including Annexation and
Rezoning. Use classification would only be a recommendation and not required.
Public Comment:
Naomi Hawf, Estes Park Housing Authority, questioned how the notice and what
type of notice would be sent. Director Hunt ansered that a 10 day notice prior to
meeting, with an add in the newspaper and mailings equal to the
It was moved and seconded (White/Foster) to aprove the agenda item
…….unanimous 6-0
11. REPORTS
Due to the length of the meeting, there were no reports given.
There being no further business, Chair Leavitt adjourned the meeting at 5:35 p.m.
_________________________________
Bob Leavitt, Chair
__________________________________
Karin Swanlund, Recording Secretary
9/12/2018 Current Projects Current Projects 1
Submittal
Date Application Type Project Name Location
Town or
County
Recomm
ending/
Decision
Making
Bodies
Next
Proposed
Meeting
Date
Ex-Parte
Prohibited Staff
01/24/18 Pre App Habitat for Humanity Lot 1 North Lake Sub T JW
03/14/18 Development Plan Wind River Apartments 1041 S Saint Vrain T TB 25-Sep TB JW
03/14/18 Amended Plat Wind River Lot Consolidation 1041 S Saint Vrain T staff JW
04/18/18 Development Plan Estes Mountain Coaster TBD Dry Gulch C staff PC/BOCC JW
04/18/18 Code Amdmt/Special Review Stanley Historic Home 415 W Wonderview T BOCC 17-Sep ALL BH
05/16/18 Special Review Wind River Daycare Facility 1041 S Saint Vrain T TB 25-Sep PC, TB JW
06/19/18 Development Plan 444 Stanley Ave 444 Stanley Ave T staff BH
06/20/18 Development Plan Inn on Fall River 1660 Fall River Rd T staff BH
06/20/18 Development Plan Alarado Business Park Steamer Drive/Big Thompson T PC 16-Oct PC BH
06/20/18 Amended Plat Cady/Beitzel 2201 High Drive C staff RB
06/21/18 Development Plan Black Canyon Inn 800 MacGregor T PC 20-Nov PC RB
06/21/18 Special Review Estes Park Trolleys 1340 Big Thompson T PC 18-Sep PC, TB JW
06/21/18 Code Amendment Estes Park Trolleys 1340 Big Thompson T TB 25-Sep ALL JW
06/22/18 Amended Plat Fish Creek Road 702, 720, 694 Fish Creek Rd C staff RB
06/22/18 Easement Vacation 1571 St Moritz Tr 1571 St Moritz Trail C BOCC 17-Sep CN
7/18/2018 Amended Plat Greenberg Amended Plat 415 Fall River Lane T staff CN
7/18/2018 Development Plan GCI Office Development Mountain View Court T staff BH
7/17/2018 Boundary Line Adjustment Discher BLA 978 Sutton Lane C staff BH
7/20/2018 Code Amendment Neighborhood/Community Meetings T/C TB 9-Oct RB
8/8/2018 Pre App Quality Inn garage/emp hsing 1450 Big Thompson T 23-Aug JW
8/13/2018 Setback Variance Graves-Blevins 216 Spruce Dr #2 T BOA 2-Oct BOA CN
8/15/2018 Setback Variance Gier 425 Birch Avenue T BOA 2-Oct BOA CN
8/15/2018 Minor Subdivision Beaver Point 1281 High Drive T PC 16-Oct PC BH
8/15/2018 Lot Consolidation Marys Lake Replat Lots 7 & 8 Marys Meadow T staff BH
8/15/2018 Rezone Castle Ridge Lot 2 Fall River Road T PC 16-Oct PC JW
8/15/2018 Minor Subdivision Ferguson Townhomes 3 & 4 1581/83/87/89 Marys Lake Rd C PC 16-Oct PC RB
8/16/2018 Pre App Peak View Apartments 1551 S St Vrain Ave T RB
8/17/2018 Special Review EPNRC T PC 16-Oct BH
8/21/2018 Variance Request Alarado Business Park Steamer Drive/Big Thompson T BOA 2-Oct BOA BH
key: PC-Planning Commission TB-Town Board BOA-Board of Appeals BOCC-Board of County Commissioners
staff: JW-Jeff Woeber BH-Brittany Hathaway RB-Robin Becker CN-consultants LH-Linda Hardin